Legal Opinion

Schaff v. Samuels

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1925No. 13862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Mike Samuels, plaintiff, had judgment against said receiver for $662.32, verdict and judgment being also for defendant Williams. Williams, in the transfer business, about six o’clock p. m. on Sunday, in 1921, at the request of plaintiff, a traveling man, stopping at a hotep. in Oklahoma City, transferred a sample trunk and a sample ease of the latter from the hotel to the depot of the defendant. Plaintiff intended to purchase) a ticket and gd to Cush-ing on the eleven o’clock p. m.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. McNeill v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Schuyler v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Farley v. Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fullgraf v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API