Legal Opinion

Maney v. Greenwood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendants from Shaw, Jat the August Term, 1921, of YANCEY. This action was brought to recover the price of timber, bargained and sold to the defendants, at their request, from plaintiff’s land, and also damages for the use of certain lands occupied by them' as a sawmill yard for sawing and storing timber cut from other lands.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendants from Shaw, Jat the August Term, 1921, of YANCEY. This action was brought to recover the price of timber, bargained and sold to the defendants, at their request, from plaintiff’s land, and also damages for the use of certain lands occupied by them' as a sawmill yard for sawing and storing timber cut from other lands. Only one issue was submitted to the jury, as follows: “Are the defendants, or any one or more of them, and if so, which ones, indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? Answer: 'Yes, all three, to the amount of $2,212.Y8.’ ” Judgment upon the…

1Opinion of the Court

WalKee, J.,

after stating the ease: The question in this case turned largely upon whether the defendants were partners in the transaction upon which the plaintiff declares. There was more than ample testimony to show that they were such partners. The defendant Joe M. Burlison signed the contract along with the plaintiff, and agreed to take and pay for the timber or logs which were merchantable, and which would saw out sound lumber. The codefendants, Greenwood and Black-stocks, if they were partners of Burlison would, of course, be responsible equally with him. The following are some of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Kornegay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. State v. . SuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Jenkins v. North Carolina Ore Dressing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Lamborn & Co. v. Hollingsworth & HatchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. W. Horace Williams Co. v. VandaveerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API