Legal Opinion
Nat'l Venture Capital Ass'n v. Nielson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 13, 2018No. Civil Action No. 17-1912 (JEB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
III. Analysis
The Government, wisely, does not contest that Plaintiffs were the prevailing parties in this case. After all, the Court awarded them complete relief, vacating the challenged Delay Rule in the process. Nor do Defendants dispute that Plaintiffs are financially eligible to receive an EAJA award. The Court, too, agrees that each Plaintiff has provided sufficient documentation in that respect. See ECF Nos. 31-1 (Declaration of Bobby Franklin); 31-2 (Declaration of Atma Krishna); 31-3 (Declaration of Anand Krishna); 31-4 (Declaration of Alex Modon); 31-5 (Declaration of Aksh Gupta).
The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barbee v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
- Brackett v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Hudson v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Infusino v. DevosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Lewis v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.