Legal Opinion

Bluman v. Federal Election Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 8, 2011No. Civil 10-1766 (BMK)(RMU)(RMC)PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs are foreign citizens who temporarily live and work in the United States. They are neither U.S. citizens nor lawful permanent residents; rather, they are lawfully in the United States on temporary work visas. Although they are not U.S. citizens and are in this country only temporarily, plaintiffs want to participate in the U.S. campaign process. They seek to donate money to candidates in U.S. federal and state elections, to contribute to national political parties and outside political groups, and to make expenditures expressly advocating…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. Ravneet SinghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Huitron-GuizarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Agency for Int'l Dev. v. Alliance for Open Soc'y Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API