Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of Grotrian

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1980No. 3-1078A290Published

1DissentStaton, Judge

I dissent.

The reason for my dissent is twofold. Although the issues are not necessarily exclusive, I will treat them as such for clarity. In PART A, the issue is raised sua sponte in the interest of assuring justice. In PART B, I offer a method for determining the inheritance tax liability in all cases. This method points out the clear error of the Majority Opinion.

PART A

This Court will not review an issue presented for the first time upon appeal except to avoid grave injustice. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. Fields (1970), 254 Ind. 219, 259 N.E.2d 651, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 930, 91 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. FIELDSIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Tax Commissioner v. Estate of BissellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Armstrong v. State ex rel. KlausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Gonser v. Bd. of Com'rs for Owen Cty.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Oldham v. NobleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API