McNeill v. County Election Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentClark, J.
(dissenting), I do hot agree that the petition filed before the county election board of Pawnee county ’by intervener was sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of that board. The majority opinion in an attempt to distinguish thfls dase from the case of Looney v. County Election Board of Hughes County et al., 145 Okla. 23, 291 Pac. 565.
“The Hughes County Case dealt with the contest in the general primary election. We are here considering a run-off primary election. The statute here under consideration is somewhat different. It provides. * * *”
In the Hughes Oounty Oase, supra, there were two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Borders v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Hume v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
- Whitney v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Looney v. County Election Board of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Batterton v. FullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.