Legal Opinion

Soto v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 1, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered on July 27, 1964, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against both defendants, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to dismiss the complaint, and, as So modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements to any party. This is not an action by the insured for a judgment declaring that his insurer must defend (see Prashker v. United States Guar. Go., 1 N Y 2d 584), bnt an action by a person injured by the insured, for a judgment declaring that the defendant United States Liability Insurance Company must defend and provide protection for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hauswirth v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Tel-Tru Manufacturing Co. v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Terry v. Farmer's Insurance Co. of ArizonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API