Hyde v. State

Asserting that this Court must vacate his habitual felony offender sentence which was imposed on count I in Case No. 95-805-CF after the appellant changed his plea to guilty,1 appellant contends that the trial court violated the dictates of Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993). We affirm.

In Ashley, our supreme court held that in order for a defendant to be habitual-ized following a guilty plea, prior to accepting that plea two requirements must be satisfied on the face of the record. First, the defendant must be given written notice of intent to habitualize, and second, the court must…