Legal Opinion
Lechtrecker v. Lechtrecker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 23, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered October 31, 1989, which denied his motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the plaintiff’s motion is granted, the proposed amended complaint is deemed served, and the defendant wife’s time to answer the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon her of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.
Leave to serve an amended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Beuschel v. MalmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bulger v. BulgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Levine v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Dinsenbacher v. DowisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Berg v. BergNew York Supreme Court · 2008