Fegan v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.

JANVIER, Judge.

No good purpose would be served by our restating the facts of this case since they have already been completely set forth by us in 195 So. 392 and by the Supreme Court in its opinion, 199 So. 635 rendered on December 2, 1940, not yet reported [in State reports].

The Supreme Court found no fault with our conclusion that the record does not contain sufficient proof to warrant a judgment on plaintiff’s claim for maintenance and cure and approved that part of our decree which remanded for further proof that part of the claim. But the Supreme Court disapproved our ruling admitting in…