Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Broom

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a decree of foreclosure and sale of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Zane C. J.:

This action was instituted to foreclose a chattel mortgage given by defendant Beardsley to the plaintiff on the fourteenth day of January, 1885, and duly recorded, to secure his promissory note of that date for the sum of $8,000. The complaint was filed on the twenty-second day of July, 1885, .and a decree was rendered for the plaintiff for the prin*177cipal and interest • due, directing sale of tbe mortgaged property to satisfy tbe same, witb costs. And tbe Utab National Bank recovered a judgment against tbe same defendant on March 18j 1885, on wbicb an execution issued August 13 of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray v. BallouNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
  2. Otis v. SillNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Thompson v. Van VechtenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commercial Security Bank of Ogden v. Chimes PressUtah Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API