Legal Opinion

Richard v. Boland

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided October 15, 1893Published

Action by Louis C. Bichard against Claude M. Boland for mali■cious prosecution. The complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff moves for a new trial on the minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The action is for malicious prosecution, under the followihg facts:- The defendant, a manufacturer and dealer patent sewing-machine needles, discharged the plaintiff from his employ on suspicion that he had been unlawfully selling an inferior article of needle under the defendant’s label and trade-mark. The defendant thereafter went before a police magistrate, accompanied by three witnesses, all of whom made affidavits proving that the offense had been committed. The defendant’s affidavit was based largely on information received from the three witnesses who accompanied him, and their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wass v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Fagnan v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Remsen v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Anderson v. . HowNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Hazzard v. . FluryNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API