Legal Opinion
Kogel v. McGoldrick
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.
The sole issue to be determined in this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act is the amount of pay differential which the petitioner is entitled to receive from the city of New York, pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 245 of the Military Law, the constitutionality of which has recently been upheld by the Court of Appeals. (Hoyt v. County of Broome, 285 N. Y. 402.)
Petitioner is and since 1936 has been the medical superintendent at the Queens General Hospital. For a period of fourteen years he has been an officer in the United States Army Reserve, attaining the rank of Major…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hoyt v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- United States v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Odell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kogel v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942