State v. Meitler
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1DissentAtcheson, J.
I
State legislatures may not override decisions of the United States Supreme Court construing federal constitutional rights by passing statutes designed to thwart those decisions and dilute those rights. That is a fundamental precept of our system of governance integrating the dual sovereignty of state and federal authorities. The search and seizure at issue in this criminal case tests a particular aspect of how that integration ought to work and, in turn, the manner in which the courts must protect citizens against egregious legislative encroachment of their rights secured in the Fourth *320Amendm…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.