Legal Opinion

Darnell Mining & Milling Co. v. Ruckles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1906No. 6269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Cowlitz county, McCredie, J., entered November 27, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits, before the court without a jury, in an action to set aside a. tax sale and deed, and to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

This action was brought by respondent. The complaint alleges that respondent is the owner of certain *181mining rights in lots 1, 2 and 3, of block B, Xnnus’ addition to Kalama, and fractional lots 1, 2, and 3, in block B, of Stone’s addition to Kalama, in.Cowlitz county, together with all the right, title, and interest in and to said lots; that the appellant has taken possession of said premises without right, and has damaged the same in particulars which are set out, and threatens to continue to remain in possession of said lots; that the appellant claims some interest in the property by way of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rowland v. EskelandWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co. v. AbitzWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Sherman v. SchomberWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Standard Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Getchell v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wyman v. Noonday Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API