Legal Opinion

(HC) Betz v. Anglea

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 26, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00681Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD LEE BETZ, No. 2:19-cv-00681-MCE-CKD 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 HUNTER ANGLEA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus 18 action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned 19 recommends sua sponte dismissing petitioner’s habeas application based on his failure to exhaust 20 state court remedies. 21 I. Factual and Procedural History 22 Following a jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API