Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hoffman v. Yoe

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1899No. 376Published

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1DissentWells, J.

It seems to me that the pivotal question in this case is as to the object and purpose of the law in authorizing investigations of this character. What is the nature of the proceeding ? If it is of a cxfimin'al nature, as assumed in the foregoing *417opinion, the judgment of this court is correct. Is the primary object of the law the punishment of an officer, or to maintain the integrity, usefulness and standing of the charitable, educational and penal institutions Of the state ? If this is a criminal proceeding, the law must be strictly followed; nothing can be taken by implication, and all…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Withrow v. Citizens Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API