Legal Opinion

Bolin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1928No. 11464PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The offense is fraudulently passing as true a forged instrument, penalty two years in the penitentiary.

Two bills of exception appear in the record to the admissibility of testimony as to certain handwriting, the objections being that the witnesses were not qualified to give evidence of such character. The truth of these objections is not verified by the court. The defendant should always incorporate so much of the evidence in the bill as is necessary to verify the truth of his objections. The mere statement of the grounds of objection is not sufficient and we are not able to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holdridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Berry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Lingo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API