Legal Opinion

People v. Burgess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant asserts that he was deprived of a fair trial because the procedures set forth in CPL 200.60 were not followed. CPL 200.60 (1) provides that “[w]hen the fact that the defendant has been previously convicted of an offense raises an offense of lower grade to one of higher grade and thereby becomes an element of the latter, an indictment for such higher offense may not allege such previous conviction.” Rather, the underlying crime must be charged in a special information and the defendant must be arraigned on such information outside the presence of the jury (see CPL 200.60 [2],…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. CleophusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. DoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. KeenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. STRAUSS, SALVATORE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API