Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Pac
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 6, 1980PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, C. J.
The present action comes to the Supreme Court upon a reservation of facts and a question of law pursuant to General Statutes § 52-406. The parties agree upon the facts on which the controversy depends and submit the following question for our advice: Whether the Indian Affairs Council is an agency within the meaning of §4-166 (1) of the General Statutes such that the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Proce dure Act (hereinafter UAPA); General Statutes §§4-166 through 4-189; are applicable to the acts and decisions of said council.
The parties have stipulated to the following facts: The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Murphy v. Berlin Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. SpearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.