St. Geme v. Boimare
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred Durieve King, Judge. Action by Anatole St. Geme and others against Frank Boimare and F. G. Adolph. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
This action is brought upon a petition which declares it to be “that of Anatole St. Geme for himself, and for the use and benefit of Albert Foureade [to the amount of one-third of the sum sued for] and of said Anatole Foureade.”
The petition recites “that Frank Boimare, who resides in New Orleans, owes petitioner $2,229.08, and Frank Adolph, who resides in New Orleans, owes petitioner $1,000 thereof, because previous to 30th of September, 1903, petitioner, Anatole St. Geme, and Ftank Boimare, had been in partnership in carrying on a successful poolroom…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
- Fox v. ThibaultSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
- Brown v. Gunning's CuratrixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Poydras v. PatinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833
- Boimare v. St. GemeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Succession of BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Timberlake v. CassidyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Rees v. SheridanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co. v. ReynaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929