Soles v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This appeal follows the trial court’s ruling on cross motions for Summary Judgment. Summary Judgment in favor of Appellee, Plaintiff in the underlying action, was granted; while a like motion filed by the Appellant, defendant, was denied.
*607A unique factual circumstance provides the basis for the instant litigation. On January 17, 1985, Appellee was traveling as a passenger in a Renault Alliance when that vehicle was involved in an accident. Appellee suffered injuries and received benefits from Allstate Insurance Company, which had issued Appellee a policy of insurance covering a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Curry v. Estate of ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Borysowski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Wright v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kosor v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Ochs v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Murray v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1990
- Soles v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Stratton v. Allstate Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1990