Legal Opinion
Oxygenator Water Technologies, Inc. v. Tennant Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 18, 2021No. 0:20-cv-00358Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Oxygenator Water Technologies, Inc., File No. 20-cv-358 (ECT/HB) Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER Tennant Company, Defendant. Nathan Louwagie, Aaron W. Pederson, Hannah Mosby O’Brien, J. Derek Vandenburgh, Philip P. Caspers, and Todd S. Werner, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh & Lindquist, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff Oxygenator Water Technologies, Inc. Lora M. Friedemann, Adam R. Steinert, and Timothy O’Shea, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN; Cara S. Donels, R. Scott Johnson, and Thomas M. Patton, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Des…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.