Legal Opinion
Mock v. Kroger Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 23, 2004No. A03A1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
Láveme Mock appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary to the Kroger Company in this slip and fall case. We find no error and affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We apply a de novo standard of review to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. Wright v. JDN Structured Finance, 239 Ga. App. 685 (522 SE2d 4) (1999).
Viewed in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Wade v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Shepard v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lipham v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adriana Mendez v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Glazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Nakia Hampton v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
- Ricardo Johnson v. Lt Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.