Legal Opinion

State v. Lackershire

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 15, 2005No. 2005AP1189-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, EJ.

¶ 1. Monika Lackershire appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of second-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2), and an order denying her postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal or resentencing. Lack-ershire argues her plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because: (1) she did not understand the elements of her crime; (2) she did not understand the nature of read-in offenses; and (3) she was coerced into accepting a plea agreement because she feared harm to her unborn child if she had to endure the stress of a trial. We discern…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ByrgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. GarciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. McQuayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LackershireWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. StraszkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. LackershireWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. LackershireWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. StraszkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API