Kidwell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we are asked to determine whether an employee’s injury, which occurred while she was practicing at home to pass one of the protocols in an annual physical fitness test given by her employer, is compensable under this state’s workers’ compensation laws. We conclude the employee’s subjective belief, that as a condition of her employment, she was requried to practice for the test, is objectively reasonable. Thus, we annul the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board).
Facts and Procedural History
On March 28, 1993, petitioner employee Linda Burnett…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ezzy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Wilson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Meyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Taylor v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vine v. Bear Valley Ski Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Stockton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Tomlin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hubbel v. Board of Trustees of the Fire & Police Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.