Legal Opinion

State v. Healy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 6, 1994No. C2-94-1015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

After a pretrial conference, the trial court certified to this court the following questions: (1) whether under the circumstances an oath administered to prospective jurors was required by statute; and (2) whether the trial court’s statement to defendant before voir dire reminding him of the oath administered to prospective jurors was sufficient to constitute an oath as required by Minn.R.Crim.P. 26.02, subd. 4(3)(c). We answer the certified questions in the affirmative.

FACTS

Defendant John Raymond Healy served on a panel of 68 prospective jurors convened for jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. State v. BatzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. VoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. MertzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API