State v. Healy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
After a pretrial conference, the trial court certified to this court the following questions: (1) whether under the circumstances an oath administered to prospective jurors was required by statute; and (2) whether the trial court’s statement to defendant before voir dire reminding him of the oath administered to prospective jurors was sufficient to constitute an oath as required by Minn.R.Crim.P. 26.02, subd. 4(3)(c). We answer the certified questions in the affirmative.
FACTS
Defendant John Raymond Healy served on a panel of 68 prospective jurors convened for jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. BatzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. VoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. MertzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011