Legal Opinion

Clay v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 2017No. CV-17-247PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShawn A. Womack, Associate Justice

| Appellant Michael Anthony Clay filed in the circuit court in the county where he was incarcerated a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-112-101 to - 123 (Repl. 2016), alleging he was actually innocent of the offense of capital murder and that his due-process rights had been violated. 1 The circuit court dismissed Clay’s habeas petition, finding that Clay had failed to establish probable cause that he was being held illegally, that the trial court lacked jurisdiction, or that the commitment was invalid on its face. On appeal, Clay renews…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hobbs v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Fields v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Philyaw v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. McConaughy v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Stephenson v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Harlon Finney v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Anderson v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Michael Anderson v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API