Legal Opinion

Woods v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 20, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNS, J:

Appellant-plaintiff brought a replevin action and upon trial the verdict was “for the defendant” and the trial court entered a final judgment that defendant recover the automobile in the hands of the sheriff.,

Motion for new trial was denied and plaintiff appeals and assigns as grounds for appeal six alleged errors of the trial judge.

The first assignment of error complains that the trial judge erred in not directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

The second and third assignments of error complain bf the trial judge, in this replevin case, having given the jury a charge on the law…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Commercial Credit Co. Inc. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Marriott v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flatte v. NicholsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. Volusia Discount Company v. Alexander KF MotorsSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Inman v. RowseySupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  4. Richter's Jewelry Co. v. Frank's Fine Jewelry, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. General Finance Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API