Carter v. The Mascotte
District Court, S.D. New York
Iii Admiralty. Suit to recover for damage to cargo and extra expense caused by ship’s docking in Brooklyn.
1Opinion of the CourtBkowh, J.
1. As respects the claim for damage to tea caused by oil, the bill of lading, as well as the master’s testimony, shows that the chests were received on board in good condition. Some of the chests on delivery were, beyond doubt, oil-stained and defaced. All that the claimants can do to exonerate the ship has doubtless been done; but, after all, the evidence shows nothing more than that they cannot explain how tlie stains and defacing occurred. It negatives certain causes that might, under some circumstances, have produced the damage; but this is not, I think, sufficient to release the ship…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Nelson v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
3Cited by3 opinions
- The PhoeniciaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1898
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. The QueenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1896
- The LennoxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1898