Legal Opinion

Overland Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1988No. 15186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

The Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission (Commission) issued a notice to Overland Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Overland) to remove a nonconforming sign because “[t]he size of the sign has been changed as prohibited by 7 CSR 10-6.-060(3)(C).” Following administrative review of that notice the Commission ordered Overland to remove that sign. Upon judicial review, the Circuit Court of Butler County found the order was not supported by competent and substantial evidence and reversed the same. The Commission appeals.

The review before the Commission was upon a stipulation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis Country Club v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Hulshof v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Gannett Outdoor Co. of Kansas City v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Foltz v. AhrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Piros Signs, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Natural Resources, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API