Legal Opinion

Huyett v. Reading

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided June 3, 1964No. 47Published

1Opinion of the CourtLipez, P. J.

(Specially Presiding),

We must determine whether the refusal to answer certain questions on the ground of self incrimination requires an order pursuant to Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 4019(c) that certain designated facts shall be taken as established for the purpose of an action in equity.

This action was begun by the issuance of a summons naming the City of Reading, its mayor and coun-*194oilmen, a former councilman, William A. Ruoff, a corporation and the individual defendants, Howard H. and Thomas A. Huber, as defendants. Plaintiff gave defendants, Ruoff and Hubers, notice of his desire to take…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Cohen v. HurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API