Legal Opinion

State v. Halili

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 29, 2017No. AC39098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The defendant, Skender Halili, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a. The defendant claims that the trial court (1) violated his sixth amendment right to confront his accuser when it prohibited him from cross-examining the complainant 1 with respect to her mental state or psychiatric history, (2) violated his sixth amendment right to present a defense and confront his accuser when it prohibited him from presenting evidence purporting to show that the complainant had solicited a bribe…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BagnaschiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. State v. LeniartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  4. State v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. State v. HaliliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API