State v. Halili
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.
The defendant, Skender Halili, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a. The defendant claims that the trial court (1) violated his sixth amendment right to confront his accuser when it prohibited him from cross-examining the complainant 1 with respect to her mental state or psychiatric history, (2) violated his sixth amendment right to present a defense and confront his accuser when it prohibited him from presenting evidence purporting to show that the complainant had solicited a bribe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BagnaschiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. LeniartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- State v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. HaliliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017