Legal Opinion

Crall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 20, 2007No. 5D06-2945Published

1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.

Rule 3.850(d), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, reads that “[i]n those instances when the denial is not predicated on the legal sufficiency of the motion on its face, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the mov-ant is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the order. Here, the appellant, George A. Crall, argues that the trial court erred in summarily denying his post-conviction motion without either holding an evidentia-ry hearing or attaching the pertinent parts of the record to the denial. The State agrees. Accordingly, we remand this matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Eastwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API