Legal Opinion

In re: Donald Harman v.

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2005No. 04-8085Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

By order of the BankruptcyAppellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c). File Name: 05b0009n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: DONALD A. HARMAN, ) ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) DONALD A. HARMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 04-8085 ) JOSEPH DAVILLA, SR., ) ) Appellee. ) ______________________________________ ) Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio, at Youngstown. No. 00-41218.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. In Re: M.J. Waterman & Associates, Inc., Debtor. Duane H. Barlow v. M.J. Waterman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re: Terry R. Talbert and Lahna L. Talbert, Debtors. Terry R. Talbert and Lahna L. Talbert v. City Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Canadian Pacific Forest Products Ltd. v. J.D. Irving, Ltd. (In re Gibson Group, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API