Treasurer of Division No. 168, A. A. of S. R. E. of A. v. Keller
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 6, Jan. T., 1903, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lackawanna Co., March T., 1902, No. 126, discharging. rule to open judgment in ease of Treasurer of Division No. 168, A. A. of S. R. E. of A., v. Charles H. Keller. Rule to open judgment. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in discharging rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D. Porter, J.,
The judgment in this case was entered upon a note payable to “ Treasurer of Division No. 168, A. A. of S. R. E. of A.,” was by confession, and in the precise terms authorized by the warrant which constituted a part of the obligation. Had the proceedings been instituted by adverse process and the name of the treasurer had not been included as a party plaintiff, or the character of the society or association had not been properly stated, the objection that the party plaintiff was not sufficiently designated, might have been fatal upon demurrer: McConnell v. Apollo…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Hara v. BaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Borough v. RoehmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Jeannette v. RoehmeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- North v. YorkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- McConnell v. Apollo Savings Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Armstrong County1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pasco Rural Lighting Co. v. RolandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Loeb v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906