Malkiewicz v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1DissentFones, Justice
It seems to me that the majority opinion makes an addition to the Workers’ Compensation Act that encroaches upon the domain of the legislature.
A guarantor of a self-insured employer’s liability under the Act is not an insurer, qualified as such and regulated as such under the laws of this State. Workers’ Compensation insurers enjoy immunity from tort liability because the legislature included “insurer” in the definition of “employer.” Guarantors are not included in that definition.
It may well be that any guarantor who assists an employer to gain self-insured status under the Act, regardless…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cavender v. HewittTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Lindsey v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Chapman v. Clement Brothers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Aerosol Corporation of the South v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.