American Forging & Socket Co. v. Wiley
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Oakland; Smith, J. Bill by the American Forging .& Socket Company against Harry'W. Wiley and others for the cancellation of certain shares of stock. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The bill of complaint in this case was filed against Harry W. Wiley, Emma McCourt, George W. Dickinson and Charles E. Duffy for the purpose of canceling 100 shares of stock in the plaintiff company, originally issued on the order and direction of said defendant Wiley to himself and to his sister, Emma McCourt, 20 shares of which were subsequently issued to George W. Dickinson, and 10 shares to defendant Charles E. Duffy. The bill alleged that defendant Wiley claimed, prior to the execution of the articles of incorporation, that he was the owner of certain patents which were then under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Great Western Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Henderson v. Plymouth Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
- Etgen v. Washington County Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- LeZontier v. ShockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Koppitz-Melchers, Inc. v. KoppitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Whaler Motor Inn, Inc. v. ParsonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.