Dietz v. Hughes
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
Field sued defendant Hughes to recover a sum of money. Defendant counterclaimed, and, after a trial on the merits, recovered judgment against appellant as a substituted party plaintiff. 1
After the announcement of' the court’s decision to award judgment for defendant, and before the entry of the judgment, about two months later, defendant assigned his interest therein. Appellant, after entry of the judgment, moved to set it aside op the ground that at the time of the signing and entry of said judgment the defendant, because of said assignments, had no interest in said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cullen & Vaughn Co. v. Bender Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- Pennington v. ThomasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
- King v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Sayre v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Granito v. GraceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Janney v. Fullroe, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943