Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Cox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1895No. 17,353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellants were adjudged guilty of contempt and fined for disobeying an order of injunction issued by the court below, restraining them from interfering with a drain extending from the lands of the appellant, Elbert IT. Shirk, to those of the appellee, Lincoln Cox.

To the information filed by the appellee, the appellant Shirk filed his verified answer, in which "he assures the court that he at no time or place violated said order. ” His answer further shows that the injunction was served upon him "on a legal holiday,” Washington’s birthday; that when served he was not within twelve miles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Fishback v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Burke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Denny v. State Ex Inf. BradyIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Anderson v. Indianapolis Drop Forging Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Economist Furnace Co. v. Wrought-Iron Range Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1898
  4. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
  5. McCulloch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API