Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nguyen v. Lawson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2025No. 2024-0960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 260.] THE STATE EX REL. N[GUY ]EN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. LAWSON ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Nguyen v. Lawson,

2025-Ohio-507.] Quo warranto—The burden to prove that laches applies generally falls on the party asserting the defense—Court of appeals erred in placing on relators- appellants the burden to prove that they had acted with the utmost diligence in asserting their claims—Quo warranto cases do not involve the election deadlines that justify shifting the burden of proving unreasonable delay from the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Freeman v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Schmitz v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Assn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Zeigler v. ZumbarOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Ascani v. Stark Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doug Hoskin, Appellant, vs. Josh Krsnak, et al., RespondentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  2. State ex rel. Koger Kidd v. EarleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API