Legal Opinion

Hunter v. 1001 Tenants Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike out paragraph “third” of defendant corporation’s answer and paragraph ‘ seventh ’ ’ of the answer of the individual defendants, under subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the defenses set forth therein are insufficient in law.

The complaint alleges a cause of action for wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, a window cleaner, due to the negligence of the defendants in failing to comply and conform with the requirements of and in violating section 202 of the Labor Law of the State of New York. The numbered paragraphs set up the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teller v. Prospect Heights HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Pollard v. Trivia Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Stern v. Great Island Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Teller v. Prospect Heights HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunter v. 1001 Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API