Legal Opinion

McBride v. Ledoux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1904No. 14,844PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Martin; T. Don Foster, Judge. Action by Pierre W. McBride against Angel Ledoux and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

NICHOLLS, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the district court in favor of all the defendants, based upofi the verdict of a jury. The action was brought against Angel Ledoux and her husband, Edmund Pellerin, and against Laurence Martin and her husband, Joseph Pellerin, praying for a solidary judgment against them for damages sustained by reason of certain false and slanderous charges against plaintiff, which he alleges were maliciously originated and circulated by the wives of the said Edward and Joseph Pellerin. The husbands were charged with “having aided and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashton v. GruckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  2. Buisson v. HuardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Baysset v. HireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maytag v. CumminsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  2. Maytag v. CumminsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API