Legal Opinion

Dinckerlocker v. Marsh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 9731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellant petitioned the Harrison Circuit Court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging in his petition that the appellee unlawfully restrained him of his liberty ; that the cause of such restraint is a mandate issued on the order of the prosecuting attorney of the said circuit court under the act of April 15th, 1881; that the petitioner was adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor by said circuit court on the 25th day of September, 1880, and that on that day Jacob F. Dinckerlocker replevied the line and costs assessed against the petitioner. The restraint is alleged to be illegal, because, 1st.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex parte BethurumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Strong v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Mullen v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Petitions to Transfer Appeals From Appellate Court to Supreme CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McCoy v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Schwomeyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API