Legal Opinion

Hill, Joyce M. v. Norton, Gale A.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 28, 2001No. 00-5432PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-712 (2000), extends protection to all birds covered by four migratory bird treaties, which, in relevant part, define migratory birds to include the family Anatidae. Congress has delegated authority to the Secretary of Interior (“Secretary”) to implement the treaties covered by the MBTA. See 16 U.S.C. § 712(2). Under this authority, the Secretary has published lists of protected migratory birds.

The instant case arose when appellant Joyce Hill filed a law…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Auguste v. RidgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Jama v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Fund for Animals v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. Collins v. National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API