James H. Herron Co. v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
This cause is here on error, and it is charged that the judgment should be reversed because a certain lease was assigned and sublet, contrary to a provision to that effect, and that certain evidence of an incompetent nature was offered under objection, as bearing upon the measure of damages for breach of contract, and, further, that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. These are the main grounds of error argued, although there are many more assignments mentioned in the motion for a new trial.
The plaintiff below was William F. Jones, and the defendant was the James H.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Neal v. JeffersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Sloan v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Snodgrass v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- S. M. Braunstein, Inc. v. McGrory Stores Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wyuta Cattle Co. v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Powerine Co. v. Russell's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016