Legal Opinion

Cirillo v. Cremonese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages *602for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Hall, J.), dated August 31, 2000, as held their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability in abeyance pending in camera inspection of the defendant’s witnesses’ affidavits in unredacted form and submission of an affirmation of the defendant’s counsel explaining the need to protect the identities of the witnesses.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The provision of the order from which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katz v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Nikac v. RukajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Triple-O Mech., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  2. Smith v. Triple-O Mech., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  3. Illions v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API