Legal Opinion

Michiels v. Succession of Gladden

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1938No. 5613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

The olographic last will and testament left by John T. Gladden, deceased, provided in part that:

“ * * * the forty acres of land in Section 2, Township 15 North, Range 2 East, being the NEj4 of SEJ4 of said section to be sold for cash and the proceeds together with my life insurance to be distributed as follows:
“First: All my honest debts/to be paid save and except the mortgages on the property left to Hooter and David which said mortgages they are to assume.”

Then follows in said will, under the instructed distribution plan, four other classifications, the first three of which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houghton v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Gremillion v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Nulsen v. HerndonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Succession of ErwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  2. Stein v. Town of LafitteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Succession of SweeneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API