Legal Opinion

Ray v. Farrow

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1924No. 5 Div. 888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The action is under the statute, and is in the nature of ejectment. The general affirmative charge, with hypothesis, was given at defendant’s request, in writing.

It is contended that the husband of the doweress and father of plaintiffs, Ransom G. Ray, had the possession of the lands sued for under claim of ownership from- 1857 to the time of his death during the Civil AVar; that he went to the war and “never came back from the army” ; that his wife and children were in the enjoyment of or in possession of the home and said land from the time said Ray went to the war and to the time the same…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Wolfe v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Woodstock Iron Co. v. FullenwiderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Winters v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Watt v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Tharp v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Williams v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Eisenberg v. SteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API