Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2013No. SD 31864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMaryw. Sheffield, J.

William Jacob Williams (“Defendant”) appeals his convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy and first-degree child molestation. See §§ 566.062, 566.067.1 Defendant argues the trial court erred in admitting into evidence State’s Exhibit 1, a video recording of an interview of Victim at the Child Advocacy Center, because the admission of the exhibit violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause. We disagree and affirm.

Standard of Review2

‘Whether a defendant’s constitutional rights were violated is a question of *906law reviewed de novo.” State v. Aaron, 218 S.W.3d 501, 506 (Mo.App.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. State v. BiggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. State v. AaronMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Interest of: N.C., Appeal of: CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API